Decevo studio5.0.9.300目录文件报红
Decevo studio5.0.9.300目录文件报红
突然显示这样就爆红,我是从5.0.3.814升到5.0.3.900又升到最新版5.0.9.300都还是会出现这样,git也是最新版了,代码是可以正常运行的,模拟器也能跑起来,就是一直爆红,还有连接远程库的时候会报错,

```java.lang.Throwable: Invalid dirty path for root D:/: D:/hw/emulator/deployed/Huawei_Phone/userdata.img.qcow2
at com.intellij.openapi.vcs.util.paths.RootDirtySet.markDirty(RootDirtySet.java:52)
at git4idea.GitVcsDirtyScope.addDirtyPathFast(GitVcsDirtyScope.kt:61)
at com.intellij.openapi.vcs.changes.DirtBuilder.addDirtyFiles(DirtBuilder.kt:33)
at com.intellij.openapi.vcs.changes.VcsDirtyScopeManagerImpl.fileVcsPathsDirty(VcsDirtyScopeManagerImpl.java:182)
at com.intellij.openapi.vcs.changes.VcsDirtyScopeVfsListener.filesChanged(VcsDirtyScopeVfsListener.java:105)
at com.intellij.vfs.AsyncVfsEventsPostProcessorImpl.processEvents$lambda$2(AsyncVfsEventsPostProcessorImpl.kt:51)
at com.intellij.openapi.progress.util.BackgroundTaskUtil.lambda$runUnderDisposeAwareIndicator$15(BackgroundTaskUtil.java:371)
at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.lambda$runProcess$1(CoreProgressManager.java:192)
at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.lambda$executeProcessUnderProgress$12(CoreProgressManager.java:610)
at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.registerIndicatorAndRun(CoreProgressManager.java:685)
at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.computeUnderProgress(CoreProgressManager.java:641)
at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.executeProcessUnderProgress(CoreProgressManager.java:609)
at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.ProgressManagerImpl.executeProcessUnderProgress(ProgressManagerImpl.java:78)
at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.runProcess(CoreProgressManager.java:179)
at com.intellij.openapi.progress.util.BackgroundTaskUtil.runUnderDisposeAwareIndicator(BackgroundTaskUtil.java:366)
at com.intellij.openapi.progress.util.BackgroundTaskUtil.runUnderDisposeAwareIndicator(BackgroundTaskUtil.java:349)
at com.intellij.vfs.AsyncVfsEventsPostProcessorImpl.processEvents(AsyncVfsEventsPostProcessorImpl.kt:50)
at com.intellij.vfs.AsyncVfsEventsPostProcessorImpl.access$processEvents(AsyncVfsEventsPostProcessorImpl.kt:20)
at com.intellij.vfs.AsyncVfsEventsPostProcessorImpl$queue$1.invoke(AsyncVfsEventsPostProcessorImpl.kt:21)
at com.intellij.vfs.AsyncVfsEventsPostProcessorImpl$queue$1.invoke(AsyncVfsEventsPostProcessorImpl.kt:21)
at com.intellij.vfs.AsyncVfsEventsPostProcessorImpl.queue$lambda$0(AsyncVfsEventsPostProcessorImpl.kt:21)
at com.intellij.util.concurrency.QueueProcessor.lambda$wrappingProcessor$0(QueueProcessor.java:84)
at com.intellij.util.concurrency.QueueProcessor.runSafely(QueueProcessor.java:253)
at com.intellij.util.concurrency.QueueProcessor.lambda$wrappingProcessor$1(QueueProcessor.java:84)
at com.intellij.util.concurrency.QueueProcessor.lambda$startProcessing$3(QueueProcessor.java:227)
at com.intellij.util.concurrency.QueueProcessor.runSafely(QueueProcessor.java:253)
at com.intellij.util.concurrency.QueueProcessor.lambda$startProcessing$4(QueueProcessor.java:227)
at com.intellij.util.concurrency.AppJavaExecutorUtil$executeOnPooledIoThread$1$1.invoke(executor.kt:24)
at com.intellij.util.concurrency.AppJavaExecutorUtil$executeOnPooledIoThread$1$1.invoke(executor.kt:24)
at com.intellij.openapi.progress.CoroutinesKt.blockingContextInner(coroutines.kt:321)
at com.intellij.openapi.progress.CoroutinesKt.access$blockingContextInner(coroutines.kt:1)
at com.intellij.openapi.progress.CoroutinesKt$blockingContext$2.invokeSuspend(coroutines.kt:198)
at com.intellij.openapi.progress.CoroutinesKt$blockingContext$2.invoke(coroutines.kt)
at com.intellij.openapi.progress.CoroutinesKt$blockingContext$2.invoke(coroutines.kt)
at kotlinx.coroutines.intrinsics.UndispatchedKt.startUndispatchedOrReturn(Undispatched.kt:78)
at kotlinx.coroutines.CoroutineScopeKt.coroutineScope(CoroutineScope.kt:264)
at com.intellij.openapi.progress.CoroutinesKt.blockingContext(coroutines.kt:197)
at com.intellij.util.concurrency.AppJavaExecutorUtil$executeOnPooledIoThread$1.invokeSuspend(executor.kt:24)
at kotlin.coroutines.jvm.internal.BaseContinuationImpl.resumeWith(ContinuationImpl.kt:33)
at kotlinx.coroutines.DispatchedTask.run(DispatchedTask.kt:108)
at kotlinx.coroutines.internal.LimitedDispatcher$Worker.run(LimitedDispatcher.kt:115)
at kotlinx.coroutines.scheduling.TaskImpl.run(Tasks.kt:103)
at kotlinx.coroutines.scheduling.CoroutineScheduler.runSafely(CoroutineScheduler.kt:584)
at kotlinx.coroutines.scheduling.CoroutineScheduler$Worker.executeTask(CoroutineScheduler.kt:793)
at kotlinx.coroutines.scheduling.CoroutineScheduler$Worker.runWorker(CoroutineScheduler.kt:697)
at kotlinx.coroutines.scheduling.CoroutineScheduler$Worker.run(CoroutineScheduler.kt:684)
楼主您好,麻烦说一下您是如何进行编辑器版本升级的?文中的报错信息是如何产生的?目前提供的信息无法分析出问题原因。
文件名标红通常是由于新增文件未加入git版本控制,可以尝试右键文件选择Git->Add尝试能否解决
Decevo Studio 5.0.9.300 目录文件报红通常是由于以下原因之一造成的:
-
文件路径问题:检查目录文件路径是否正确,确保路径中没有非法字符或拼写错误。
-
文件权限问题:确认目录文件具有适当的读写权限,确保Decevo Studio能够访问和修改这些文件。
-
文件损坏:目录文件可能已损坏或丢失。尝试重新生成或替换这些文件。
-
版本兼容性问题:确保Decevo Studio版本与目录文件版本兼容。如果目录文件是为旧版本创建的,可能需要更新或转换文件格式。
-
软件配置错误:检查Decevo Studio的配置文件,确保没有错误的设置导致目录文件报红。
-
依赖项缺失:某些目录文件可能依赖于其他文件或库。确认所有必要的依赖项都已正确安装和配置。
-
缓存问题:清理Decevo Studio的缓存,有时缓存中的旧数据可能导致文件报红。
-
软件Bug:如果以上方法均无效,可能是Decevo Studio本身的Bug。检查是否有可用的更新或补丁。
根据具体情况,逐一排查上述问题,以解决目录文件报红的问题。
Decevo Studio 5.0.9.300 目录文件报红通常表示文件路径或配置文件存在异常。建议首先检查文件路径是否正确,确保所有依赖文件存在且可访问。其次,查看配置文件内容,确认是否符合软件要求。如果问题仍未解决,尝试重新安装软件或更新至最新版本。如果报红与特定文件相关,可能需要替换或修复该文件。最后,查阅官方文档或联系技术支持以获得进一步帮助。